| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha : |
23/07/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
02/09/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
DEVINCENZI, T.; JAURENA, M.; DURANTE, M.; SAVIAN, J.V.; CIAPPESONI, G.; NAVAJAS, E.; CIGANDA, V.; LATTANZI, F.; PARUELO, J. |
|
Afiliación : |
THAIS DEVINCENZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARTIN ALEJANDRO JAURENA BARRIOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARTÍN DURANTE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria INTA Concepción Del Uruguay, Concepción del Uruguay, Argentina; JEAN VICTOR SAVIAN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CARLOS GABRIEL CIAPPESONI SCARONE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ELLY ANA NAVAJAS VALENTINI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; VERONICA SOLANGE CIGANDA BRASCA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FERNANDO A. LATTANZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOSÉ PARUELO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Building the GLENCOE Platform -Grasslands LENding eConomic and ecOsystems sErvices. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, June 2021, volume 516, Article 547301. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.547301 |
|
ISSN : |
2571-581X |
|
DOI : |
10.3389/fsufs.2021.547301 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 31 March 2020, Accepted 26 April 2021, Published 16 June 2021.
Edited by: Iain James Gordon, Australian National University, Australia. Reviewed by: Karl Behrendt, Harper Adams University, United Kingdom; Kamaljit Kaur Sangha, Charles Darwin University, Australia.
This article is part of the research topic: Grazing in Future Multi-scapes: From Thought scapes to Landscapes, Creating Health from the Ground Up (Url: https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/11179/grazing-in-future-multi-scapes-from-thoughtscapes-to-landscapes-creating-health-from-the-ground-up#articles)
Correspondence: Devincenzi, T.; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Programa Producción de Carne y Lana, Estación Experimental INIA Tacuarembó, Tacuarembó, Uruguay; email: tdevincenzi@inia.org.uy |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT - To feed the rising population whilst also preserving ecosystem functions, creative solutions are needed for the ecological intensification of natural grassland-based livestock systems. In Uruguay, natural grasslands are the main nutritional resource for livestock production. In these ecosystems, cattle and sheep graze together all the year round, and grasslands are frequently heavily grazed. Considerable research has been generated concerning grassland management, but there is still no knowledge about the impact of decision rules that supports management actions on long-term ecosystem functioning, at the system level. To meet this deficit, a participatory working group of farmers, researchers, and consultants have developed the GLENCOE platform. This platform is a large-scale facility, supported by INIA-Uruguay, designed to answer the following question: How to intensify the grazing management to improve the sustainability of livestock systems based on natural grasslands? To build the platform three steps were followed: (I) definition of the research problem using a problem tree analysis; (ii) conceptualization of the platform and the design of the grazing systems to be evaluated; and, (iii) spatial allocation of the grazing systems according to the variability of soil, slopes, and seasonal dynamic of vegetation indexes. These criteria were considered across farmlets that were equivalent in the initial stage, allowing causal inferences for the systems trajectories on productive and environmental traits. The platform is composed of three independent farmlets of 50 ha each, where multiparous Hereford cows and Merinos wethers co-graze under three grazing management systems. Each farmlet is managed according to different spatio-temporal decisions of the specific management of vegetation communities, grazing methods, and the stockpile of forage that is allowed by the number of the existing paddocks. Farmlet-1; comprises less decisions (2 paddocks), Farmlet-2; intermediate (8 paddocks), and Farmlet-3; high level of decisions (32 paddocks). This innovative platform will be used as a participatory and interdisciplinary space for research and co-learning of management on processes that can only be observed in long-term evaluations, and at farmlet scale. We expect that this new approach will contribute to the developement and implemention of sustainable grazing management systems in Uruguay.
© Copyright © 2021 Devincenzi, Jaurena, Durante, Savian, Ciappesoni, Navajas, Ciganda, Lattanzi and Paruelo. MenosABSTRACT - To feed the rising population whilst also preserving ecosystem functions, creative solutions are needed for the ecological intensification of natural grassland-based livestock systems. In Uruguay, natural grasslands are the main nutritional resource for livestock production. In these ecosystems, cattle and sheep graze together all the year round, and grasslands are frequently heavily grazed. Considerable research has been generated concerning grassland management, but there is still no knowledge about the impact of decision rules that supports management actions on long-term ecosystem functioning, at the system level. To meet this deficit, a participatory working group of farmers, researchers, and consultants have developed the GLENCOE platform. This platform is a large-scale facility, supported by INIA-Uruguay, designed to answer the following question: How to intensify the grazing management to improve the sustainability of livestock systems based on natural grasslands? To build the platform three steps were followed: (I) definition of the research problem using a problem tree analysis; (ii) conceptualization of the platform and the design of the grazing systems to be evaluated; and, (iii) spatial allocation of the grazing systems according to the variability of soil, slopes, and seasonal dynamic of vegetation indexes. These criteria were considered across farmlets that were equivalent in the initial stage, allowing causal inferences for the systems trajectories... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Beef-cattle; Campos grasslands; Mixed-grazing; Rangelands; Sustainable intensification. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L02 Alimentación animal |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16658/1/fsufs-05-547301.pdf
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2021.547301/pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04320naa a2200313 a 4500
001 1062321
005 2022-09-02
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2571-581X
024 7 $a10.3389/fsufs.2021.547301$2DOI
100 1 $aDEVINCENZI, T.
245 $aBuilding the GLENCOE Platform -Grasslands LENding eConomic and ecOsystems sErvices.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Received 31 March 2020, Accepted 26 April 2021, Published 16 June 2021. Edited by: Iain James Gordon, Australian National University, Australia. Reviewed by: Karl Behrendt, Harper Adams University, United Kingdom; Kamaljit Kaur Sangha, Charles Darwin University, Australia. This article is part of the research topic: Grazing in Future Multi-scapes: From Thought scapes to Landscapes, Creating Health from the Ground Up (Url: https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/11179/grazing-in-future-multi-scapes-from-thoughtscapes-to-landscapes-creating-health-from-the-ground-up#articles) Correspondence: Devincenzi, T.; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Programa Producción de Carne y Lana, Estación Experimental INIA Tacuarembó, Tacuarembó, Uruguay; email: tdevincenzi@inia.org.uy
520 $aABSTRACT - To feed the rising population whilst also preserving ecosystem functions, creative solutions are needed for the ecological intensification of natural grassland-based livestock systems. In Uruguay, natural grasslands are the main nutritional resource for livestock production. In these ecosystems, cattle and sheep graze together all the year round, and grasslands are frequently heavily grazed. Considerable research has been generated concerning grassland management, but there is still no knowledge about the impact of decision rules that supports management actions on long-term ecosystem functioning, at the system level. To meet this deficit, a participatory working group of farmers, researchers, and consultants have developed the GLENCOE platform. This platform is a large-scale facility, supported by INIA-Uruguay, designed to answer the following question: How to intensify the grazing management to improve the sustainability of livestock systems based on natural grasslands? To build the platform three steps were followed: (I) definition of the research problem using a problem tree analysis; (ii) conceptualization of the platform and the design of the grazing systems to be evaluated; and, (iii) spatial allocation of the grazing systems according to the variability of soil, slopes, and seasonal dynamic of vegetation indexes. These criteria were considered across farmlets that were equivalent in the initial stage, allowing causal inferences for the systems trajectories on productive and environmental traits. The platform is composed of three independent farmlets of 50 ha each, where multiparous Hereford cows and Merinos wethers co-graze under three grazing management systems. Each farmlet is managed according to different spatio-temporal decisions of the specific management of vegetation communities, grazing methods, and the stockpile of forage that is allowed by the number of the existing paddocks. Farmlet-1; comprises less decisions (2 paddocks), Farmlet-2; intermediate (8 paddocks), and Farmlet-3; high level of decisions (32 paddocks). This innovative platform will be used as a participatory and interdisciplinary space for research and co-learning of management on processes that can only be observed in long-term evaluations, and at farmlet scale. We expect that this new approach will contribute to the developement and implemention of sustainable grazing management systems in Uruguay. © Copyright © 2021 Devincenzi, Jaurena, Durante, Savian, Ciappesoni, Navajas, Ciganda, Lattanzi and Paruelo.
653 $aBeef-cattle
653 $aCampos grasslands
653 $aMixed-grazing
653 $aRangelands
653 $aSustainable intensification
700 1 $aJAURENA, M.
700 1 $aDURANTE, M.
700 1 $aSAVIAN, J.V.
700 1 $aCIAPPESONI, G.
700 1 $aNAVAJAS, E.
700 1 $aCIGANDA, V.
700 1 $aLATTANZI, F.
700 1 $aPARUELO, J.
773 $tFrontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, June 2021, volume 516, Article 547301. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.547301
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
02/02/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
18/05/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
CONDE, P.; GARCIA, C.; VILLAMIL, J.J.; IBÁÑEZ, F.; ZOPPOLO, R.; ARIAS-SIBILLOTTE, M.; PONCE DE LEÓN , I.; BORSANI , O.; GARCÍA INZA, G. |
|
Afiliación : |
ANA PAULA CONDE INNAMORATO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CLAUDIO CESAR GARCIA GALLARRETA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JUAN JOSE VILLAMIL SILVA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FACUNDO IBÁÑEZ SILVA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ROBERTO JOSE ZOPPOLO GOLDSCHMIDT, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MERCEDES ARIAS-SIBILLOTTE, Unidad de Ecofisiología de Frutales, Departamento de Producción Vegetal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República (UDELAR), Garzón 780, Montevideo 12900, Uruguay; INÉS PONCE DE LEÓN, Departamento de Biología Molecular, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay; OMAR BORSANI, Laboratorio de Bioquímica, Departamento de Biología Vegetal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo 12900, Uruguay; GEORGINA PAULA GARCÍA INZA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
The impact of irrigation on olive fruit yield and oil quality in a humid climate. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agronomy, 2022, vol.12, issue 2, e313. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020313 |
|
ISSN : |
eISSN 2073-4395 |
|
DOI : |
10.3390/agronomy12020313 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 15 December 2021; Revised 4 January 2022; Accepted 11 January 2022; Published: 26 January 2022.
Academic Editor: José Casanova Gascón.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Responses to Stress and Environmental Stimulus: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/agronomy/special_issues/environmental_stimulus |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- The expansion of olive orchards into regions with no tradition of olive production and humid climates, such as Uruguay, with more than 1200 mm of annual rainfall, calls into question the need for irrigation. In these regions, however, years with water deficit during summers are quite common. The vapor pressure deficit during summer is lower than in countries with a Mediterranean climate. The high variability in interannual water availability in the current context of climate change, with a growing tendency for extreme events to occur, emphasizes the need to evaluate the production response of olive trees to irrigation. To achieve this, three irrigation treatments were applied to Arbequina and Frantoio cultivars according to the value of the maximum crop evapotranspiration: a first treatment applying 100% ETc, corresponding to being fully irrigated; a second treatment applying 50% ETc; and a third treatment in which neither irrigation nor rain inputs occurred from the end of the pit hardening period until harvest. Results show the possibility of an increasing fruit weight and pulp/pit ratio through irrigation in the local environmental conditions. The oil content in response to irrigation was different within cultivars. Water restriction conditions did not affect the oil content of olives in Arbequina, while in Frantoio it increased it. Polyphenols in fruit increased under water stress for both cultivars. The technological applicability of the results obtained must be accompanied by an economic analysis. The results obtained highlight the need for better use of irrigation water during the growth and ripening phase of the olive fruit under a humid climate.
© 2022 by the authors. MenosABSTRACT.- The expansion of olive orchards into regions with no tradition of olive production and humid climates, such as Uruguay, with more than 1200 mm of annual rainfall, calls into question the need for irrigation. In these regions, however, years with water deficit during summers are quite common. The vapor pressure deficit during summer is lower than in countries with a Mediterranean climate. The high variability in interannual water availability in the current context of climate change, with a growing tendency for extreme events to occur, emphasizes the need to evaluate the production response of olive trees to irrigation. To achieve this, three irrigation treatments were applied to Arbequina and Frantoio cultivars according to the value of the maximum crop evapotranspiration: a first treatment applying 100% ETc, corresponding to being fully irrigated; a second treatment applying 50% ETc; and a third treatment in which neither irrigation nor rain inputs occurred from the end of the pit hardening period until harvest. Results show the possibility of an increasing fruit weight and pulp/pit ratio through irrigation in the local environmental conditions. The oil content in response to irrigation was different within cultivars. Water restriction conditions did not affect the oil content of olives in Arbequina, while in Frantoio it increased it. Polyphenols in fruit increased under water stress for both cultivars. The technological applicability of the results obtained must... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Drought stress; Fruit growth; Oil content; Olea europaea L; PLATAFORMA AGROALIMENTOS; Polyphenols; Stem water potential. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
|
URL : |
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/2/313/pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03044naa a2200337 a 4500
001 1062733
005 2022-05-18
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $aeISSN 2073-4395
024 7 $a10.3390/agronomy12020313$2DOI
100 1 $aCONDE, P.
245 $aThe impact of irrigation on olive fruit yield and oil quality in a humid climate.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history: Received 15 December 2021; Revised 4 January 2022; Accepted 11 January 2022; Published: 26 January 2022. Academic Editor: José Casanova Gascón. This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Responses to Stress and Environmental Stimulus: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/agronomy/special_issues/environmental_stimulus
520 $aABSTRACT.- The expansion of olive orchards into regions with no tradition of olive production and humid climates, such as Uruguay, with more than 1200 mm of annual rainfall, calls into question the need for irrigation. In these regions, however, years with water deficit during summers are quite common. The vapor pressure deficit during summer is lower than in countries with a Mediterranean climate. The high variability in interannual water availability in the current context of climate change, with a growing tendency for extreme events to occur, emphasizes the need to evaluate the production response of olive trees to irrigation. To achieve this, three irrigation treatments were applied to Arbequina and Frantoio cultivars according to the value of the maximum crop evapotranspiration: a first treatment applying 100% ETc, corresponding to being fully irrigated; a second treatment applying 50% ETc; and a third treatment in which neither irrigation nor rain inputs occurred from the end of the pit hardening period until harvest. Results show the possibility of an increasing fruit weight and pulp/pit ratio through irrigation in the local environmental conditions. The oil content in response to irrigation was different within cultivars. Water restriction conditions did not affect the oil content of olives in Arbequina, while in Frantoio it increased it. Polyphenols in fruit increased under water stress for both cultivars. The technological applicability of the results obtained must be accompanied by an economic analysis. The results obtained highlight the need for better use of irrigation water during the growth and ripening phase of the olive fruit under a humid climate. © 2022 by the authors.
653 $aDrought stress
653 $aFruit growth
653 $aOil content
653 $aOlea europaea L
653 $aPLATAFORMA AGROALIMENTOS
653 $aPolyphenols
653 $aStem water potential
700 1 $aGARCIA, C.
700 1 $aVILLAMIL, J.J.
700 1 $aIBÁÑEZ, F.
700 1 $aZOPPOLO, R.
700 1 $aARIAS-SIBILLOTTE, M.
700 1 $aPONCE DE LEÓN , I.
700 1 $aBORSANI , O.
700 1 $aGARCÍA INZA, G.
773 $tAgronomy, 2022, vol.12, issue 2, e313. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020313
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
